Sunday, December 12, 2004

old is the new new

Just read a fantastic article by Jonathan Franzen about his experience with his father's alzheimer's disease and death:

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?010910fa_FACT1

Its long, and probably won't interest you unless you're thinking about a parent's possible demise. But if you are dealing with that, then it may help you in some way.

There's a bit where talks about how he remembers his father. He contrasts memories through letters his mom and dad wrote to his personal memories of his father. And then he riffs about how we remember things:

"The will to record indelibly, to set down stories in permanent words, seems to me akin to the conviction that we are larger than our biologies".

He goes on to speculate about the "postmodern resurgence of the oral and the eclipse of the written: our incessant telephoning, our ephemeral emailing..."

I'd say that emailing, and blogging, isn't that ephemeral after all. So maybe the written, searchable, (semi) permanent communication culture is back in a bigger way than ever. In the event of a blogger's death or alzheimers, their blog gains value. Memories fade and distort. I think as the blogging generation gets older, we'll start to realize the impact of this new imprint we leave behind. Its the next in a long line of technologies used to try to conquer the horrid emptiness left by death of a loved one. The first thing people used photos for were portraits which they held on to after the person died. Then sound, then video. Maybe its this increasingly giant sea of permanent records of people's lives that has our hip culture stuck in retro mode. With every sample of an Isley Brothers song, with every remake of a movie, our environment is made up of clothes/sounds/lives past.

But we don't consider this healthy, do we? We have pictures and old letters from loved ones who died, or maybe we broke up with someone years ago. People go to the trouble of destroying these reminders so as not to be tempted by them. I'm fine with remeniscing over old photos, but when I watch video of people who are gone, well, it just feels wrong. We can conjure their presence, but generally we choose not to, probably b/c once you start down that road, living in old photos, home movies, old blog entries, maybe it'll be hard to turn back to the absence, the uncertain.

I think IM culture was really the triumph of written culture. When people copy chat transcripts and save them (as I've seen in a few blogs), then we are setting in stone so many interactions. You may ignore your old chat transcripts, old photos, old videos, choosing not to live in the past. But maybe me or one of my dorky friends will take it, sample it, give it a new context and new life as a birthday gift or art. In these ways, we are decreasingly mortal.

Saturday, December 04, 2004

alright, alright

Following up on last entry...

My offline journal has moved from literary to analytic and now, its actually looking kinda bloggy.

By that, I mean I just record stuff very quickly, broad strokes, not well written. Merely recording so that I don't forget. I don't like this. That stage of my life when I was unemployed and desperately unhappy living in NYC yielded by far the best writing in my journal. I took the time to be articulate.

Which brings me to a deep question: should you ever go back and edit/delete old entries in your journal or blog? I know everyone would say, "of course not! You've gotta remember the past, warts and all". Well, I've looked back at old entries, from, say, after the first time I got my heart broken, and those are some pretty big, ugly warts. Fundamentally, its nothing TOO horrible, probably not that different from anyone else's experience (yet this doesn't make it something we shouldn't be embarrased about others seeing, not unlike wiping your ass). And even though i know that its not likely that anyone will find or read that offline journal, I still have this urge to delete.

Wednesday, December 01, 2004

More on blogging

(Maybe this will be a meta-blog, where I just ramble on and on about blogs)

Remember 'logs?

You should keep a blog so you can go back days or months or years from now and look back and see what you were thinking, doing, or what your writing voice was like.

I've been keeping this quaint off-line journal for quite some time. Every now and then, I go back and read old entries, and I think its really changed my self-image. Obviously, there's a lot of "boy, was I stupid back then", but there's also a lot of "history repeats itself more than I noticed". I'm more aware of the patterns in my life. Phases, too - sentimental, ironic, literary, bitter, analytic, jokey. Like old photos, it becomes increasingly difficult to believe you inhabited these words.

And if you're detailed enough in your chronicling, it can really feel like time traveling, inhabiting the old you.

Favorite insult of the day:

Monday, November 29, 2004

You should blog. seriously, dude.

I refuse to do anything unless I can bring something new to the table. Could there be anything "new" in the oversaturated world of blogs? Sure. But it'll probably take too much damn effort to think of it.

In the meantime, here are some thoughts about blogging:

If everyone has a blog (and I gotta admit, it was pretty easy to set this up), and writes a brief synopsis of what they do and think each day, and you could search for ideas, behaviors, etc by googling all blogs, then the internet (or rather tha corner of the internet known as the blogosphere) would begin to resemble the collective consciousness that the entire internet was intended to be (instead of the vast wasteland of advertisements and shitty defunct personal webpages it is).

When you look at this blog, or any other blog, or your blog, as an individual voice, it can seem pathetic. With so many voices, it seems as though there would never be any reason for anyone to listen to anyone else. But if you can search for ideas within them, then they don't seem so pathetic. Instead of the reader being all, "I wanna see what Joe Random did or thought or felt today" he or she'd be all, "I wonder what PEOPLE think of that new Handsome Boy Modeling School album?" or "what do PEOPLE think of me?".

I'm learning about all the imperfect ways people have tried to gauge public opinion. But if everyone would spill their guts in blogs, then every researcher could have instant access to a much more accurate picture of what public opinion truly is. And it won't just be marketers and social scientists who will use it. Anytime anyone is curious what other people think of 'x', they'll be able to find out.

People are stuck on the idea of reading things on the net "linearly". I think in the future, we'll read things "through" search engines. We'll have a question and we'll go thru the search engine to an EXCERPT of a site or blog, take what we need and bail. As the writer, its hard not to assume a linear reader. I guess writing on the web will evolve to be search friendly (as TV programming evolved after the remote control). I could put popular phrases in my blog to attract hits via google (e.g. clown porn). But then search engines will evolve to weed out things searchers don't want. Another arms race, I suppose.

Obviously, the blogosphere doesn't even come close to reflecting the population, demographically. But they're making it so durn easy to start one of these things. It just seems like the next logical step in this whole internet revolution. So blog, dammit. Write the most boring, bitchy, self-indulgent, unreadable blog you can write.